Planning commission debates how to define building height for 'R' residential districts after temple variance

Planning & Zoning Administrator Vance McKinnon told the commission that staff had reviewed the International Zoning Code after a recent Hindu Temple variance request and is proposing clearer language for Chapter 165 to define building height in residential zoning districts, including treatment of appurtenances.

Commissioner Jay Goodin questioned whether religious institutions should be treated differently than other uses because “religious institutions are not regulated under zoning in the traditional manner,” and asked for clarification on the term “non-occupiable space.” McKinnon said staff is considering International Zoning Code language addressing appurtenance heights and clarified the intent of the non-occupiable-space terminology.

McKinnon recommended “maintaining the current 35-foot building height limitation in the R-4 District while addressing church height allowances through footnotes.” Commissioner Matt Mitzel asked whether Chapter 165 should impose additional engineering requirements for structures above certain heights; City Clerk/Treasurer Lisa Goodin noted that engineering requirements are already covered by the Building Code. Commissioner Todd Roberts asked about consistent application of height limits across districts, and Commissioner Goodin asked whether a dome could be constructed above a single-family residence; McKinnon confirmed that the City’s current interpretation would allow that form.

McKinnon concluded by asking commissioners to review Chapter 165 and identify provisions needing clarification or more detailed language. The discussion did not produce a formal motion to change Chapter 165 during this meeting; staff indicated they would return with proposed ordinance language for future consideration.