Get email alerts on the Industry Testimony topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Municipal and cooperative representatives urged mutual agreements and raised concerns about "cherry picking"
Summary
Industry witnesses from municipal and cooperative associations testified before the conference committee, urging mutual agreement for transfers and asking that voluntary annexations be allowed during the moratorium; counsel clarified the draft covers lawful annexations up to the moratorium date.
Get email alerts on the Industry Testimony topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representatives from municipal utilities and cooperative associations spoke briefly to the committee under a three-minute limit. Jeremy Elroy of the Tennessee Municipal Electric Power Association asked whether annexations completed before Sept. 1 would be grandfathered and requested that voluntary annexations be allowed during the moratorium so landowners who want to join a city are not prevented from doing so. He said he "appreciate[d] y'all including that, essentially, that grandfather clause."
Erica Penley of Bass & Sims, speaking for the Tennessee Electric Cooperative Association, told the committee co-ops view the current acquisition process as unfair and described longstanding concerns about acquisitions that leave cooperatives vulnerable to "cherry picking." Penley said the association's position is to prefer mutual agreements for acquisitions and dispositions. Legal counsel Matt Money confirmed the draft covers "any type of lawful annexation, including the consent of landowners who want to be annexed into the municipality or if they wanna do it by referendum," up until the moratorium date. Panelists were dismissed after questions.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
