Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Auditing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Comptroller calls Memphis forensic audit 'the worst' he's seen; explains limits of routine audits

Conference Committee · April 20, 2026

Summary

Comptroller Jason Mumpower told the conference committee the forensic audit of Memphis‑Shelby County Schools revealed severe deficiencies and differs from routine contractor audits; he said his office reviews contractor work papers but does not redo contractors' work and that forensic audits are costly and require legislative direction.

Jason Mumpower, the comptroller of the treasury, testified that forensic audits are a different, more intensive product than standard financial and compliance audits and that the forensic audit of Memphis‑Shelby County Schools has revealed extraordinary deficiencies.

"It would be an understatement to say that it showed a deficiency in management ... it's the worst audit we've ever seen," Mumpower said in committee testimony. He explained that the routine audits reported to the comptroller are contract audits performed by independent CPA firms under a three‑party contract; the comptroller's office reviews the audit and posts it but does not redo the contractor's work. He said forensic audits are more labor intensive and expensive and thus usually undertaken only with legislative interest or explicit authorization.

Committee members pressed the comptroller on why other counties with repeat findings (Polk, Murray) had not received forensic audits; Mumpower said his office could order forensic audits outside legislative direction but that the cost and labor intensity make that unlikely without legislative interest.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source