Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves two‑lot subdivision and Conditional Use Permit for 00 Breakfast Hill
Summary
The Planning Board approved a two‑lot subdivision at 00 Breakfast Hill and granted a Conditional Use Permit to allow a driveway intrusion into a wetland buffer, finding the cul‑de‑sac access reduces overall wetland impact; approval came with standard state‑permit and administrative conditions.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Greenland's Planning Board approved a two‑lot subdivision at 00 Breakfast Hill and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to permit a driveway that slightly encroaches in a wetland buffer, after hearing that accessing the lots from a new cul‑de‑sac would cause less overall wetland disturbance than upgrading the existing route.
Scott Cole of Beals Associates said the design was intended to avoid more extensive wetland impacts and that the plan includes a turnaround and planned fire hydrants adjacent to it. The board noted the proposal reduces disturbance compared with an alternative that would have required upgrades through more sensitive wetland areas.
The CUP and subdivision were approved with conditions mirroring the larger 340 Breakfast Hill project: receipt of all required state permits (NHDOT driveway permit, Alteration of Terrain, State Subdivision), final Altus Engineering sign‑off, Postmaster approval for mail kiosk placement, review of HOA documents and conservation easements, test pits, lot corner pins prior to plan recording, and submission of required digital files and the recording mylar. The motions passed unanimously; motions recorded in the minutes list D. Moore and J. McDevitt among the movers/seconders.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
