Get email alerts on the Superintendent Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board member Boyce frames superintendent evaluation as a governance tool
Summary
Board member Lisa Boyce told the Provo School District board the superintendent evaluation should be evidence- and goal-based, aligned with the district strategic plan, and used as an ongoing formative governance tool rather than a once-a-year judgment.
Lisa Boyce, a board member, opened a brief training explaining that the superintendent evaluation is meant to guide district governance and improve outcomes rather than just judge one person’s performance. "The purpose of our superintendent evaluation isn't just to judge Wendy's performance," Boyce said, adding that good evaluations should link directly to the district strategic plan and include measurable, objective evidence and periodic check-ins.
Boyce urged the board to treat evaluation as a two-way process that supports the superintendent and holds the board accountable for setting priorities and providing the conditions for success. She said evaluations should combine formative feedback during the year with a summative review, and recommended aligning evaluation measures with the district's strategic goals so the board and superintendent remain focused on the same outcomes.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
