Get email alerts on the Land Use Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board considers amendments to TDR and noncontiguous development standards; public comments registered
Summary
Commissioners agreed to consider amendments to Transfer Development Rights (26-09) and Noncontiguous Development (26-10) standards to allow administrative subdivision of certain Open Space parcels for lot-line adjustments (not new lots); public commenters addressed these ordinances during the meeting.
County staff presented proposed amendments to clarify how Open Space parcels that remain following the conveyance of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) or that are created on noncontiguous developed parcels may be administratively subdivided to accommodate lot-line adjustments but not to create additional lots. The Board agreed to consider an amendment to County Ordinance No. 26-09 (TDR standards) and likewise agreed to consider an amendment to County Ordinance No. 26-10 (Noncontiguous Development standards).
Public commenters at the meeting raised concerns and questions about Ordinance Nos. 26-09 and 26-10; the minutes list Jay Falstad, Ann Goodman and Jeffrey Thompson as speaking to these ordinances during the public comment period. Commissioners Wilson and McLaughlin asked questions during the consideration of the amendments.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
