Get email alerts on the Daep Collegeview Separation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Richard Connor urges CSISD to separate DAEP from College View High School
Summary
Richard Connor, an English teacher at College View High School, told the board that physically separating the district's disciplinary/alternative program would give each campus a distinct mission, leadership and identity and help College View better recruit as an early college campus.
Richard Connor, an English teacher at College View High School, urged the College Station ISD board during the hearing-of-citizens portion to physically separate the district's disciplinary/alternative program from College View.
"Separating College View and DAP would allow each campus to establish a distinct mission, culture, and public identity," Connor said, arguing separation would let College View emphasize its early college model while allowing the DAEP to build specialized systems for behavior, academic continuity and reentry to home campuses.
Connor told trustees a separate DAEP campus would permit dedicated leadership and staffing tailored to students who need disciplinary or intervention services. He said the move would help College View shed a persistent public perception that it is "simply the DAP campus," improving recruitment and making it clearer to families what the early college campus offers.
Board President Iggy thanked Connor for his comments before the board moved into its workshop agenda. The board did not take immediate action during the public-comment period; trustees later discussed College View and DAEP relocation as part of the central-office and facilities conversation in the workshop.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
