Get email alerts on the Tax Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adds CCA to tax-administration study comparing in‑house and RITA
Summary
Council amended and adopted Resolution 26-6 directing the Tax Commissioner to prepare a side‑by‑side analysis of the city's in‑house tax administration, the Regional Income Tax Agency (RITA), and the Central Collection Agency (CCA) to evaluate costs, benefits and services.
Port Clinton City Council on Aug. 11 amended and adopted Resolution 26-6 to direct the Tax Commissioner to prepare a side‑by‑side analysis comparing the city's current in‑house municipal income tax administration, the Regional Income Tax Agency (RITA), and the Central Collection Agency (CCA).
The amendment — moved by Cathy King and seconded by Beth Gillman — added CCA to the resolution’s scope and updated language throughout the document to refer to RITA or CCA. The voice-roll calls to amend and to adopt the amended resolution were both recorded as 7-0.
At one point during the discussion a council member asked what CCA is; Mrs. King said, "it is the Cleveland Tax Division; they provide it for other municipalities. It is a competitor of RITA." The resolution instructs the Tax Commissioner to prepare a comparative analysis of costs, benefits and services each model would provide to Port Clinton taxpayers.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
