Get email alerts on the Hhap 6 Mou topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HHHC ratifies amended HHAP-6 MOU; motion passes with one abstention
Summary
The Humboldt Housing & Homelessness Coalition Executive Committee voted to ratify an amended MOU required for HHAP-6 funding. The motion, moved by Aaron Zell and seconded by Saul Lopez, passed with one abstention; the CoC is not a legal entity and must use the MOU to receive funds.
Get email alerts on the Hhap 6 Mou topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Humboldt Housing & Homelessness Coalition Executive Committee on April 3 ratified an amended memorandum of understanding required for eligibility for HHAP-6 funding. Aaron Zell (DHHS) moved the motion, and Saul Lopez (Nation’s Finest) seconded it; the committee recorded one abstention and the remainder voted in favor, and the motion passed.
Committee staff explained the change is required because the Continuum of Care (CoC) is not a legal entity and therefore cannot hold or be sued on HHAP contracts; amending the MOU with Humboldt County will allow the county to receive HHAP-6 funds on the CoC’s behalf. The committee agreed the MOU amendment is a prerequisite for accessing the HHAP-6 allocation.
The motion was filed as Motion #1 (Zell/Lopez) on the April 3 agenda. Meeting minutes record “1 abstained, all in favor,” and meeting attendance was recorded earlier in the agenda; the transcript did not provide a named roll-call of votes. The committee noted no substantive policy change beyond the administrative correction to meet HHAP-6 eligibility requirements.
The EC adjourned at 11:59 a.m.; the next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for April 22, 2026 over Zoom.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
