Get email alerts on the Land Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission accepts veterans‑housing subdivision for review, notes address discrepancy
Summary
The commission accepted a minor‑subdivision plan for a veterans housing project on a 1.59‑acre parcel, specifying three‑bedroom, two‑bath 1,440 sq ft homes; the engineer recommended percolation testing and wetlands/floodplain checks. Review comments are due before the April 14 meeting.
Get email alerts on the Land Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chairperson Reda Briglia and the Paradise Township Planning Commission voted to accept for review a minor subdivision plan for a veterans housing project on a 1.59‑acre parcel.
Engineer Charles Unangst recommended "having the PERC tests done," verifying there are no wetlands and confirming the parcel is not in a floodplain; he also flagged a possible right‑of‑way tweak. The materials and the agenda contain inconsistent address references (agenda: "410 Hunters Farm Rd."; project materials and discussion: "14 Hunters Farm Road"). The commission recorded both references and did not resolve the discrepancy at the meeting.
The plan as described in the record would create two lots to support single‑family homes intended for veterans: three bedrooms, two baths, approximately 1,440 square feet each, on a 1.59‑acre site. Hanover (the engineering reviewer) will review the submitted minor‑subdivision plan for Lot 1 and provide comments to the commission within two weeks, ahead of the April 14 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Kevin Transue moved to accept the plan for review; Commissioner Paul Morgan seconded. Motion carried 4‑0.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
