Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Sb 685 Opposition topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senator Ochoa Boke opposes SB 685, citing late amendments and practical concerns

Senate Education Committee · August 28, 2026

Summary

Senator Ochoa Boke said she could not support SB 685 because she received the analysis at the hearing, worried about late changes, and questioned how sectarian schools would separate religious instruction from state‑funded secular IEP services; she voted no in committee.

Senator Ochoa Boke questioned how SB 685 would work in practice and said she received the analysis only at the hearing, limiting her ability to evaluate late language changes. During questioning she said the bill "is a thinly veiled attempt to restrict aid to schools, which allow sectarian content," and expressed concern about parents' choices and operational logistics.

Ochoa Boke told colleagues she was "not going to be supporting this bill today" and emphasized the need for more stakeholder engagement to understand how schools would navigate separating sectarian curriculum from contracted, state‑funded nonsectarian IEP services. She invited further conversations with schools and stakeholders before endorsing the approach.

Senator Cabaldon and other supporters countered that the bill corrects an existing statutory barrier created by prior law and court rulings; Cabaldon said the measure would allow sectarian schools to apply for contracts to provide nonsectarian services and described the approach as carefully targeted to keep public funds from paying for religious instruction.

Ochoa Boke recorded the lone no vote on the committee roll call; sponsors and the CDE said implementation details would be worked out with stakeholders after the bill advances.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source