Commission delays window-signage code changes after questions on enforcement and measurement

The Planning Commission opened discussion on a proposed amendment to Riverton's sign code (PLZ26-5006) that would define "window sign," set measurement rules for coverage and clarify exceptions, but agreed to continue the item after commissioners expressed concerns about enforcement vagueness and measurement.

Staff explained that a prior enforcement case revealed ambiguity in the existing 50% window-coverage rule and recommended adding a definition and measurable standards so staff and business owners have a clear compliance tool. Tim told the commission the proposal would permit window signs on ground-floor tenant spaces, set a 50% cap on any single window and a cap on total window coverage per tenant (staff presentation and later discussion settled on a working cap of about 33% of an individual tenant's total window surface). Several commissioners said language allowing "authorized law enforcement representatives" to determine visibility is too vague and could expose business owners to subjective enforcement. Commissioner Clef recommended removing that clause or otherwise tightening the standard; commissioners also asked for clearer rules on second-floor windows and how to measure contiguous window blocks. The commission voted unanimously to continue the item so staff can return with revised language addressing these concerns.

What happens next: staff will redraft the amendment to clarify measurement, remove or tighten the law-enforcement-determined-visibility language, and return the item at a future meeting for public hearing and action.