Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates survey questions and data segregation before finalizing community survey
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a draft community survey, raised concerns about personal questions and whether responses would be identifiable; staff said responses can be segregated by geography and agreed to confirm whether individual responses would be viewable before final approval.
Staff distributed a draft community survey and commissioners discussed content and privacy concerns. One commissioner said certain demographic questions felt intrusive; another asked whether responses would be tied to addresses or remain anonymous. Staff replied the survey can segregate responses by area and that the draft is associated with addresses so county staff could know that a response came from a given address, but commissioners asked for clarification and privacy assurances before final approval.
Commissioners asked staff to verify whether survey submissions can be aggregated and segregated by area without exposing individual responses and to return with answers so the commission can finalize the survey at the next meeting or work session.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
