Get email alerts on the Procedures And Document Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board seeks missing signed redline that would require second vote on funding
Summary
Advisers and staff discussed a redlined revision from a Dec. 10, 2025 RDA meeting that appears to insert an additional oversight vote on funding after plan and cost summaries are returned; staff located a redline but not a fully executed version and will forward it for finalization.
An adviser (S4) raised a procedural concern about a redlined revision from the Dec. 10, 2025 RDA meeting that added a step between project approval and funding that would require the board to vote after plan and cost summaries are returned. "It was this 2nd vote after the plan and cost summaries and estimates are brought back to the board that that vote is intended to be a genuine, oversight vote, up or down, for funding," the adviser said.
Staff (S8) said they found a redlined version of the section edited by a previous city attorney but have not located a fully signed, executed document. Staff committed to forwarding the redline to the chair (Jesse) to pursue signature and completion so the board can confirm whether the added oversight step is in effect.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
