Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident told special exception likely needed for recreational subdivision
Summary
A property owner seeking to subdivide 10–14 acres for recreational use was told she likely must pursue a Special Exception under 'Section 735 Other Recreation Area of a Nonprofit Nature'; the buyer was told there are no building rights with the subdivision.
Resident Susanne Sardino, owner of parcel ID-20K, asked the board about subdividing her land for a buyer who intends family recreational use, including parking a camper on weekends and riding ATVs. "She is aware there are no building rights available if she subdivides," the minutes record, and the buyer understands those restrictions.
Solicitor Sharon Myers reviewed the township ordinances with Sardino and said she "would need a Special Exception for Section 735 Other Recreation Area of a Nonprofit Nature." The board did not take formal action during the meeting; Solicitor Myers recommended the special-exception process as the likely path forward.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
