Citizen Portal

Auditors give Milton an unmodified opinion but cite two material weaknesses

City of Milton City Council · September 1, 2026

Summary

Warren Averitt CPAs reported a clean (unmodified) opinion for the City of Milton and the CRA, but identified two material weaknesses—untimely cash reconciliations and errors in grant revenue recognition—that staff will report again in next year’s audit unless monthly reconciliation procedures are sustained.

Kristin McAllister, partner at Warren Averitt CPAs, told the City of Milton council that the city and the Community Redevelopment Agency received an unmodified (clean) audit opinion for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2025. "The most important first takeaway for you is that the City and the CRA did receive an unmodified opinion," McAllister said, adding that the clean opinion means the financial statements are "fairly presented in all material respects."

McAllister warned the council that a clean opinion does not mean there were no problems. She identified two material weaknesses: delays in completing bank reconciliations that required about 35 journal entries to correct cash accounting and errors in grant revenue recognition that affected the annual financial report and single audit filing. "Those two findings are the findings related to your cash reconciliation process and your grant revenue reconciliation process," McAllister said, referencing findings 2025-001 and 2025-002. Management has acknowledged the findings and has a corrective action plan; auditors noted the reconciliations were completed over the summer and that monthly reconciliation procedures are being implemented by the newly appointed finance director and comptroller.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source