Citizen Portal

Staff brief Planning Commission on design-standards testing: Rhino models, mass timber and code edits

Redmond Planning Commission · September 10, 2026

Summary

Long-range planning staff presented phase-3 testing of updated design standards (code audit complete) using 3-D Rhino models; staff reported constraints for small parcels, courtyard/open-space conflicts, and that mass timber may require taller heights or alternate pathways to pencil out.

Odra Cardenas of long-range planning presented the phase-3 design standards update, describing the project as the implementation of Redmond 2050 design priorities and noting the team has completed a code audit and is testing code performance with 3-D models. “The way we're doing the testing is using these 3 d models where we actually test the building form,” Cardenas said, describing a manual modeling workflow using Rhino rather than an automated input process.

Staff described four typologies used in testing — a constrained small site, a podium (concrete podium with wood above), a mass-timber typology and a tower — and reported mixed results. Some constrained sites produced low FAR yields under current standards and indicated a need for a small-building alternative. Staff said several standards can conflict (for example courtyard requirements vs. corner treatments), which sometimes reduces yield or complicates design. For mass timber, staff said taller floor-to-floor heights make the typology less feasible under current height limits and recommended considering height adjustments or explicit alternative pathways if the city wants to encourage mass-timber construction.

Staff outlined next steps and timeline: complete the second phase of testing after drafting edits, update illustrations and return final drafts for formal review in Q1 2027 with adoption targeted for Q2 2027. Staff also said public engagement is ongoing (Let's Connect comments open) and a developer workshop is planned by year-end.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source