Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Selective topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident alleges selective enforcement, seeks refunds and inspections
Summary
Resident George Chachas told the commission he believes selective enforcement and discrimination occurred in prior code enforcement actions, cited a $355 fine and a $500 refund to another property owner, and requested records and follow-up inspections for multiple properties across Ely and White Pine County.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Selective topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During public comment, resident George Chachas raised multiple allegations of selective enforcement by city and county code officials and requested records and remedial action. He said a prior building inspector, Don Hendrickson, condemned a property at 450 Ogden Avenue and filed a complaint that led to a $355 fine for Mr. Zevas; George contrasted that with his claim that another property owner, Mark Moattar, was later refunded $500 after years of noncompliance and asked that Mr. Zevas be refunded as well.
"There is no place for selective enforcement or discrimination in the City of Ely or White Pine County," George told the commission and asked for copies of letters sent to property owners who have not met required conditions. He also raised multiple site-specific compliance questions — including development at 292 Aultman Street, a lack of foundation observed there, and missing curb and gutter at a new home at 1151 on the corner of 12th Street and Avenue H — and asked who is responsible for installing required infrastructure under Ely City Code.
The minutes record no direct administrative response or timeline for follow-up; commissioners later said such matters should be brought forward as agenda items for formal consideration.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
