Alignment Analysis Results

"H.B. 223: Utah State Grant Administration Cost Disclosure Act"

Summary: The bill aims to regulate federal and state grant allocations, ensuring compliance with federal standards while respecting state autonomy. It seeks to balance federal oversight with state discretion in managing grant funds.

Constitutional Considerations

The bill primarily engages the Spending Clause of Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to allocate federal funds, and the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers to the states. The bill's provisions must navigate the delicate balance between federal conditions on grants and state sovereignty.

Relevant Clauses, Articles, or Amendments

Alignment or Conflict

The bill generally aligns with constitutional principles by respecting state powers under the Tenth Amendment, allowing states significant discretion in managing grants. However, it must ensure that federal conditions attached to grants do not overreach, which could conflict with the Spending Clause if not carefully managed.

Areas of Ambiguity

The bill's language regarding the conditions under which federal grants can be withheld is somewhat vague, potentially leading to disputes over federal overreach. Clarification is needed on the extent of federal oversight permissible without infringing on state powers.

Alignment Scores

Provision Score Rationale
Federal Grant Conditions 70 % The provision aligns with the Spending Clause but requires careful implementation to avoid overstepping federal authority.
State Management of Grants 90 % This provision strongly aligns with the Tenth Amendment, as it supports state autonomy in managing grant funds.

* 0% (conflicting) ... 50% (neutral) ... 100% (fully aligned)

Note: The Bill Analysis Tool is a work in progress. We are working hard to make the analysis more accurate every day. Please take this into consideration when deciding how to use the information it provides to you. As with any tool, use it judiciously.