Utah Supreme Court Oral Argument - Griffin v. Snow Christiansen and Martineau, #20230812

Utah Supreme Court · November 4, 2024

0:00/50m

50:37

0:00

10:00

20:00

30:00

40:00

50:00

Pre-argument housekeeping and time allocation

0:00 → 1:02(1m 3s)

Court provides procedural instructions: counsel may remain, 20 minutes were allotted for assigned questions from the bench, and rebuttal time will not be cut; the court notes differing question counts may lead to uneven speaking time.

Keywords:

Speakers:

Oral argument before the Utah Supreme Court on whether the Court of Appeals improperly broadened the Rule 4 definition of “managing (or general) agent,” affecting when process on corporations is effective; counsel debated whether the change should come from rule amendment or judicial interpretation.

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Transcript

Unlock the transcript with a paid subscription