Utah Supreme Court Oral Argument - State v. Anderson, #20230603

Utah Supreme Court · November 4, 2024

0:00/1:06

1:06:15

0:00

20:00

40:00

1:06:15

Case opening and appearances

Presentation

0:02 → 0:51(49s)

Clerk or presiding justice opened the argument in State v. Anderson, called appearances: Natalie Edmondson for the State (SEG 007, SEG 013) and Laurie Seppi for Mr. Anderson (SEG 009). Court announced rules about time and rebuttal (SEG 003–005) and invited the state's argument (SEG 012–013).

Keywords:

Speakers:

Oral argument before the Utah Supreme Court over whether the word “district” in the criminal venue statute refers to a judicial district (the state's reading) or a prosecution district (the defense's reading). Attorneys debated the statute's 1973 wording, historical practice, and possible consequences for cross-county prosecutions; the court took the matter under advisement.

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Transcript

Unlock the transcript with a paid subscription