Utah Supreme Court Oral Argument - University of Utah v. Tullis, #20230672

Utah Supreme Court · October 28, 2024

0:00/1:32

1:32:39

0:00

20:00

40:00

1:00:00

1:30:00

Court opens and appearances

Presentation

0:03 → 1:55(1m 52s)

Presiding justice greets the courtroom, explains time limits (20 minutes per side, 3 minutes rebuttal) and requests appearances. Counsel for University of Utah (Amy Sorensen, Annika Jones, Cameron Cutler) and for the Tullis family (Mark Yohallam, Christine Durham, Dino Hemonis) identify themselves and reserve rebuttal time. Case caption announced: University of Utah v. Tullis.

Keywords:

Speakers:

Oral arguments before the Utah Supreme Court over whether the courts 1989 Condomarine decision forecloses application of the modern Utah Governmental Immunity Act damages cap in a medical-malpractice suit against university-affiliated care providers. Counsel debated stare decisis, changes to the UGIA, the Board of Examinersexcess-claims process, and practical consequences for plaintiffs and hospitals.

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Transcript

Unlock the transcript with a paid subscription