Utah Supreme Court Oral Argument - In re E.M. #20220968 Part 1
Utah Supreme Court · September 10, 2024
Oral arguments in Inray EM: defense argued juvenile transfer order should be vacated for legal errors in applying retention/transfer factors; the State defended a holistic, comparative reading of the statute. Justices pressed both sides on statutory scope, evidentiary burdens, and what counts as the qualifying offense.
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.
No transcript available.
No outline available for this source.
No related articles available for this source.
No highlights available for this source.
No claims available for this source.
No actions available for this source.
No topics available for this source.
No clarifying details available for this source.
No discussions available for this source.
No community relevance data available for this source.
No funding sources available for this source.
No speakers available for this source.
No transcript available for this source.
