Armon Yusef Pazouki v. State of Tennessee

Tennessee Appellate Court (oral argument) · November 13, 2025

0:00/21m

21:31

0:00

5:00

10:00

15:00

20:00

Court opens; procedural request for rebuttal time

0:01 → 0:08(7s)

Presiding judge opened the session and asked counsel whether they wished to reserve rebuttal time; petitioner’s counsel (David Christensen) asked to reserve five minutes of rebuttal.

Keywords:

Speakers:

Oral arguments considered whether the Post-Conviction Relief Act applies to revocations of judicial diversion in a case where diversion was revoked after the defendant accrued new arrests; counsel for the petitioner argued collateral attack should be permitted, while the state urged affirmance of the lower court’s dismissal.

AI-Generated Content

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

No transcript available.