State of Tennessee v. Earl David Maney
Judicial · November 13, 2025
Appellate oral argument in the case of appellant Earl Manny focused on whether lay‑witness testimony that the victim ‘‘was not a threat’’ improperly injected opinion under Rule 701 and on challenges to a split confinement sentence of 11 months, 29 days for an 87‑year‑old defendant. The court recessed and set further proceedings for December 18.
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.
No transcript available.
No outline available for this source.
No related articles available for this source.
No highlights available for this source.
No claims available for this source.
No actions available for this source.
No topics available for this source.
No clarifying details available for this source.
No discussions available for this source.
No community relevance data available for this source.
No funding sources available for this source.
No speakers available for this source.
No transcript available for this source.