State of Tennessee v. Maurice Tyrone Flanigan
Tennessee appellate court (oral argument) · December 19, 2025
Oral arguments in an appellate proceeding over Maurice Flanagan's habeas petition centered on whether the trial court properly granted habeas relief sua sponte and which state lawyer (district attorney or attorney general) was the proper respondent; the panel discussed remand to redo jail-credit calculations with the correct parties present.
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.
No transcript available.
No outline available for this source.
No related articles available for this source.
No highlights available for this source.
No claims available for this source.
No actions available for this source.
No topics available for this source.
No clarifying details available for this source.
No discussions available for this source.
No community relevance data available for this source.
No funding sources available for this source.
No speakers available for this source.
No transcript available for this source.