Watermark LLC. v. RH Benea Cranberry Co. Inc. et al, SJC-13843

Judicial - Supreme Court · February 5, 2026

0:00/35m

35:20

0:00

10:00

20:00

30:00

35:00

Opening argument by Watermark LLC

PresentationDiscussion

0:29 → 2:25(1m 55s)

Jason Rollins, attorney for Watermark LLC, argued the Superior Court erred by resolving intent on summary judgment and that the notice of intent did not state conversion to residential, industrial, or commercial use as required by Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 61A, section 14; he said the notice instead described subdividing 'two 40,000-square-foot lots' and maintaining the remainder as agricultural, and urged that intent is a question of fact for trial.

Keywords:

Speakers:

Oral argument before the Supreme Judicial Court over whether a notice under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 61A, §14 triggered the town of Duxbury's right of first refusal and whether factual intent issues require trial.

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Transcript

Unlock the transcript with a paid subscription