Division 2 Court of Appeals
Other Court · January 26, 2026
Oral arguments over the meaning of “mailed to” in a Washington garnishment statute (RCW 6.27.200). Appellant’s counsel said the 7-day response window should start on actual delivery; respondent’s counsel said the statute can be read to start when a notice is deposited in the mail. Judges questioned practical consequences for employers and creditors.
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.
No transcript available.
No outline available for this source.
No related articles available for this source.
No highlights available for this source.
No claims available for this source.
No actions available for this source.
No topics available for this source.
No clarifying details available for this source.
No discussions available for this source.
No community relevance data available for this source.
No funding sources available for this source.
No speakers available for this source.
No transcript available for this source.