State of Tennessee v. Michael Anthony Huerta

Court of Criminal Appeals · March 26, 2026

0:00/31m

31:26

0:00

5:00

10:00

15:00

20:00

25:00

30:00

Appointment and procedural posture

Presentation

0:00 → 1:14(1m 14s)

Appellate counsel explained he was appointed by Judge Harrington and that Mr. Huerta had filed a pro se pleading characterized as a motion to reconsider; counsel amended it in the trial court to a motion to withdraw the guilty plea and moved to consolidate that motion with an appeal of sentencing.

Keywords:

Speakers:

Actions:motion-withdraw-guilty-plea

Oral arguments were heard in March 2026 at the Court of Criminal Appeals on an appeal and a post‑sentencing motion to withdraw a guilty plea in the case of Mr. Huerta, focusing on whether his plea was knowing and voluntary and whether sentencing enhancement factors were properly applied.

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Transcript

Unlock the transcript with a paid subscription