William E. O'Connor v. MAG Mutual Insurance Company, SJC-13821

Judicial - Supreme Court · April 8, 2026

0:00/0m

0:00

Case caption and counsel appearance

0:00 → 0:23(23s)

Clerical caption of the case SJC‑13821 and Attorney Christopher Trundy opens for plaintiff‑appellant William O'Connor, asking the court to reverse the Superior Court's coverage determination.

Keywords:

Speakers:

Oral argument before the Supreme Judicial Court on whether MagMutual Insurance Company must defend Dr. William O'Connor against a Board of Registration in Medicine complaint alleging improper prescribing tied to non-medical motives; central issues included timing (prescriptions in 2016, policy in 2019), whether regulatory defense covers non-medical allegations, and the scope of the duty to defend versus indemnify.

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Transcript

Unlock the transcript with a paid subscription