Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Everett council approves Rucker Avenue Corridor Phase 2 despite displacement concerns

Everett City Council · August 31, 2026

Summary

The Everett City Council adopted an ordinance establishing the Rucker Avenue Corridor Phase 2 special improvement project (Council Bill 2608-47) after public comment about potential housing takings and relocation; the council voted 6–1, with Vice President Ryan opposed.

The Everett City Council on Sept. 16 adopted an ordinance to create a special improvement project for the 41st Street and Rucker Avenue Corridor Phase 2 (Council Bill 2608-47), voting 6–1 after hearing sustained public concern about possible property takings and housing displacement.

Mayor Cassie Franklin and public works staff outlined the project as a freight-corridor improvement that will include intersection upgrades, radius widening, and new concrete pavement on West Marine View Drive between Pacific and Terminal Avenue. Tom Hood, public works, told the council the project "has been in the works for a few years" and described the design stage now before the city. "Technically, we're not required to follow federal relocation assistance," Hood said, adding that "in my 28 years at the city ... we do an equivalent amount of work compensation, relocation assistance, and all of that for all of the acquisitions that we make when relocations are required." The council discussion emphasized the need for additional outreach as designs firm up.

The item drew multiple public comments from residents who said they only recently learned their buildings could be affected. Steven Faulkner, a resident of District 2, asked whether federal relocation-assistance programs would apply and whether renters would be protected, saying many neighbors worry they will be "tossed out" if properties are taken. Frankie Gill, representing residents of a building at Avenue Pacific and Norton, said the community feels like "an after thought" and demanded clearer, timely outreach and commitments on relocation and accountability.

Council member Bader Samuels moved to adopt the ordinance; Council member Tuohy seconded. The clerk recorded votes: Bader Samuels — yes; Vice President Ryan — no; Council member Verbano (as recorded) — yes; Council member Tuohy — yes; Council member Weir — yes; Council member Zarlingo — yes; President Schwab — yes. The motion passed and the council instructed staff to continue design, conduct additional outreach (in person and online), and provide further detail about property impacts and relocation options as the process advances.

Next steps include final design work funded by the ordinance and additional public outreach recommended by staff. The council also scheduled follow-up conversations and indicated possible future phases beyond this stage, but staff said additional phases are not yet programmed.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source