Commission asked whether alternative development forms or greater clustering could reduce site impacts
Apr 28, 2026
Commissioners asked staff and the consultant whether denser clustering (townhomes) or other alternatives were feasible and clarified that the P1 clustering and state density‑bonus rules limit what the town can require.
The full story
During discussion after public comment, commissioners pressed staff to explain alternatives evaluated and whether the town could require a different housing form. David Compton explained that the P1 process is meant to cluster development rights and that the town cannot unilaterally require a different private development form unless a general plan amendment is pursued (which would trigger a Measure S vote). He said a developer could propose higher density townhomes, but the town could not force that design without specific findings.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →