Committee members and JNC chair clash over scoring method and transparency
Members questioned the commission's aggregate 20‑point scoring and whether extreme scores or abstentions allowed manipulation; the JNC chair said he has detailed vote tallies and offered to discuss them in executive session.
The full story
Committee members expressed concern that the Judicial Nominating Commission's aggregation method let candidates with limited trial experience receive high overall scores.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in