Council vote on development resolution marred by electronic-voting confusion
A routine roll-call using the chamber's electronic panel produced confusion during the vote on Resolution R-40-96; city staff and the attorney intervened to clarify the outcome before the mayor announced the motion had failed.
The full story
The Rosenberg council's vote on Resolution R-40-96 encountered confusion when councilors used the electronic voting panel. After Amanda moved to reject and George seconded, the mayor noted votes appeared "opposite" on the machine, and council members and staff worked to correct entries. The city attorney advised the body that failing to pass the motion to reject does not automatically accept the underlying resolution and that a separate motion would be required to accept the agreement.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in