Ordinance fixes omission in motion and appeals code
Ordinance 20 26-32 would correct a blank subsection in the borough code governing motion procedure and planning commission appeals; staff characterized it as a technical correction to restore missing language.
The full story
Borough staff member Kelly presented Ordinance 20 26-32, which would amend KPB 21.20 0.300 to fix an omission in motion procedure language and clarify hearing officer appeals. Kelly described the change as correcting an error in the code discovered when reviewing planning-commission appeal procedures, noting that "subsection c where the reply is, it was blank." The presentation characterized the ordinance as a technical correction rather than a policy change.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in