Kenilworth considers process‑based approach to setbacks and upper‑floor stepbacks
Summary
Consultant proposed shifting from prescriptive setback distances to a review‑driven approach (ARC, Plan Commission, SUP) requiring stepbacks above the second floor on a case‑by‑case basis; trustees discussed 5' side yard and rear setbacks via SUP.
The Board reviewed a revised standards chart and considered whether to specify fixed setback and stepback distances or require a process that determines upper‑floor stepbacks through the Certificate of Appropriateness/Special Use/ARC review. Michael Blue contrasted prescriptive distances from the July 28 draft with a recommendation that the code require some defined stepback for floors above the second level with dimensions determined through review.
Trustees clarified that front yards would be a 0' build‑to line (unless parking provided), side yards would be a minimum 5' if provided, and rear yard setbacks would be evaluated as part of Special Use permitting. Trustees also discussed how setback/stepback requirements would apply differently for new construction versus existing structures and projects above or below 10,000 square feet.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
