Zoning official: proposed industrial addition may trigger site-development process and variances
Building inspector Dan told the council that a proposed addition on a commercial/industrial property would expand the building to about 46% of existing area, triggering a site-development plan; Mr. Myers may scale back to avoid the 25% threshold, otherwise public notice and potential BZA review will be required.
The full story
Building inspector Dan briefed the council on a submittal from a property owner (referred to as Mr. Myers) who is proposing a large addition. Dan said the addition would increase the building area to roughly 46% of the existing footprint, which exceeds the 25% threshold that triggers the site-development plan process; if the owner reduces the addition to stay under 25% the project could avoid that trigger but would still likely need setback variances.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in