Town attorney cites Indiana case law: domicile requires physical move plus concurrent intent
Town counsel and council members referenced Indiana precedent holding that a domicile remains until a new one is established and requires both a physical move and clear intent to remain; contingent plans do not suffice, counsel said.
The full story
Town attorney Will told Lapel council members that Indiana case law treats ‘domicile’ as continuing until a new one is established and requires both a physical move and a concurrent, definite intent to remain. “To establish a new residency, there must be physical there must be a physical move coupled with a definite intent to remain alongside acts taken,” the attorney said while summarizing precedent.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in