Board says CCR 'violation' was filing error after lab/IBM communication breakdown
The board reported two CCR flags were procedural: staff said testing and results were satisfactory but a software/transmission change between the lab and IBM caused the state's filing window to be missed; the board directed staff to add explanatory material to the website and minutes.
The full story
Board members reviewed a Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) filing that the state flagged; the chair said the district complied with testing requirements but that a change in how laboratories submit results (or IBM's software handling) meant the state did not receive files on time. The chair said the CCR could not contain explanatory text so the board wanted an explanation added to the meeting minutes and posted on the website.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in