Jacobs flags Burger Cabin adverse effect, triggering Section 106 and 4(f) work
Jacobs told council that its re‑evaluation identified an adverse effect to the historic Burger Cabin, which will require additional Section 106 consultation and a Memorandum of Agreement; the team also reported a draft 4(f) evaluation and Section 6(f) considerations for Murrell Open Space that may require replacement property or mitigation.
The full story
Jim Clark, part of the Jacobs team, briefed council on environmental resource findings for the CO‑82 reevaluation and said most resources show no adverse effect but the team determined that "the burger cabin, was determined to have an adverse effect," which triggers additional consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the need to develop a Memorandum of Agreement describing mitigation.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in