Neighbors and staff debate Compass 2040 and lot‑size guidance in Fulton Ridge case
Opponents argued the Fulton Ridge plan conflicts with Clay County’s Compass 2040 comprehensive plan and estate‑residential 5‑acre guidance; staff explained the property crosses managed growth and estate‑residential tiers and that smaller lots may be allowed with city consultation.
The full story
Several speakers told the board the Fulton Ridge proposal violated the county’s Compass 2040 comprehensive plan. Opponents noted the property is partly in an estate‑residential (5‑acre minimum) designation and partly in a managed‑growth area, and they argued the application conflicts with the plan and Kearney’s future‑land‑use map.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in