Committee adopts AI‑disclosure language for artist RFPs
Summary
The committee voted to add a statement to artist RFPs requiring disclosure of generative‑AI use and demonstration of substantive human authorship; the policy allows AI tools only when fully disclosed and when the artist can show human creative control.
The committee voted to adopt a draft AI‑use statement for artist requests for proposals and contracts that requires disclosure of generative‑AI tools and maintains that submissions must demonstrate substantive human authorship.
Members reviewed the proposed language and asked whether a fully disclosed AI process would be accepted; staff clarified that disclosure alone is not sufficient—artists must also demonstrate substantive human authorship and creative control. The text read in the meeting included the line: “AI tools, for example, text to image or text to 3D generative systems will not be considered eligible unless fully disclosed.” The committee adopted the language and directed staff to incorporate it into future RFPs and contracts.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
