County staff cites state code requiring servicing contracts as committee debates holding-tank agreement language
Staff told the Planning & Zoning Committee it removed a holding-tank agreement from the draft ordinance at corporate counsel's request and cited SPS 3.83 provisions requiring servicing contracts and annual monitoring for holding tanks, prompting discussion about which requirements are state-mandated versus county policy.
The full story
During a detailed review of the Chapter 16 red-line, staff told the committee that corporate counsel advised removing the holding-tank agreement language from the ordinance and that state administrative rules require a separate servicing contract and management plan for holding tanks.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in