Committee seeks clearer sidewalk and bike-path commitments on site plans
Members questioned color-coded site plan legend and whether walkways vs sidewalks and bike paths would provide continuous pedestrian connectivity; they requested clarification on ownership (public vs private) and whether sidewalk construction along State Route 332 and internal roads was included in the developer's amenities.
The full story
Committee members repeatedly asked staff to clarify the site-plan legend that uses yellow for sidewalks and gray for a 6-foot asphalt bike path, and to indicate where sidewalks would be dedicated to the town versus remain on private roads. One member noted that some interior roads (e.g., Road C) appear to have sidewalks only on one side, which would require residents to cross private drives to access them.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in