Staff outlines decision framework: affordability vs. reliability, sustainability and flexibility
Sep 28, 2026
City staff proposed a decision framework tied to measurable benchmarks — retail/wholesale rate comparisons, SADI reliability metrics, emissions in metric tons, and counts of solar installations or EV chargers — to evaluate procurement options ahead of a rate study.
The full story
City staff presented a decision framework to evaluate future procurement options, identifying four core categories: affordability, resilience/reliability, sustainability and flexibility (formerly described as "custom programs"). For affordability the staff recommended benchmarking total cost per kilowatt‑hour against ComEd and peer municipalities; for reliability staff recommended tracking SADI (System Average Interruption Duration Index); sustainability metrics would include metric tons of carbon produced and counts of solar installations or EV chargers; and flexibility would be measured by uptake in programs like green energy certificates or demand‑response participation.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →