Engineer: three broad approaches exist for ice mitigation, but each has limits
Jun 17, 2026
Matt Chenoweth, a bridge engineer and consultant, outlined three mitigation approaches—mechanical removal, thermal systems, and passive design changes—and warned of costs, power needs and corrosion risks on a 100% steel structure.
The full story
Matt Chenoweth, national bridge practice leader for RS&H and former MDOT chief bridge engineer, summarized three broad categories of ice mitigation studied for large bridges: mechanical removal (devices or crews that physically break or expel ice), thermal systems (electrical resistance heating, hot air, infrared) and passive design (sheathing shapes, coatings, hydrophobic surfaces). "1 is some sort of mechanical removal of the ice," Chenoweth said while explaining how each approach trades off effectiveness, safety and cost.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →