Committee debates three pathways — keep team, issue RFP, or developer‑led push
Steering committee members weighed pros and cons of (1) keeping the current consultant team and road map, (1b) keeping engagement but RFPing the technical role, and (2) a developer‑led approach, focusing discussion on schedule trade‑offs and procurement delays.
The full story
Committee members spent the bulk of the meeting weighing three broad pathways presented by the facilitator: option 1a (retain the full consultant team and proceed with the road map), option 1b (retain the engagement team but solicit an RFP for the technical/development advisory role), and option 2 (a developer‑led approach intended to accelerate delivery). Several members stressed that choosing a new firm would introduce at least a multi‑month procurement and onboarding delay.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in