Advisors debate target timing: early ambition versus feasible, non‑performative paths

Oct 6, 2026

Advisory group members argued over pursuing earlier net‑zero dates (2040–2045) versus a steadier, more achievable path—stressing that state law, utility planning and transmission buildout affect credibility. Several urged the CAP to include an "art of the possible" vision alongside feasible pathways.

The full story

Elizabeth and other members urged the county to explore bolder targets, including county‑wide net‑zero nearer 2040, and to highlight 'the art of the possible' so the plan surfaces high‑impact, politically ambitious options as well as feasible ones. Elizabeth said she was "so disappointed at what we're looking at here in terms of the challenge that's still ahead of us," calling for scenarios that show what a single major policy change (for example overturning Dillon Rule constraints) could yield.

Free newsletter

Sign up to keep reading.

Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.

or
Already have an account? Sign in