Advisors debate target timing: early ambition versus feasible, non‑performative paths
Oct 6, 2026
Advisory group members argued over pursuing earlier net‑zero dates (2040–2045) versus a steadier, more achievable path—stressing that state law, utility planning and transmission buildout affect credibility. Several urged the CAP to include an "art of the possible" vision alongside feasible pathways.
The full story
Elizabeth and other members urged the county to explore bolder targets, including county‑wide net‑zero nearer 2040, and to highlight 'the art of the possible' so the plan surfaces high‑impact, politically ambitious options as well as feasible ones. Elizabeth said she was "so disappointed at what we're looking at here in terms of the challenge that's still ahead of us," calling for scenarios that show what a single major policy change (for example overturning Dillon Rule constraints) could yield.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →