Board evaluation committee proposes annual cadence and performance indicators
The evaluation committee presented a discussion paper proposing an annual evaluation cycle for the board and executive director with mid-cycle pulse checks, indicators tied to the adopted priorities, and a final annual review at the retreat; members discussed timing, bylaw alignment and a possible skills/succession inventory.
The full story
Chelsea (evaluation committee chair) presented a discussion paper outlining a proposed annual process for evaluating both the State Board and the executive director. The plan would align evaluation to the board's adopted priorities, include semiannual mid-cycle pulse checks with the executive director and chair, and culminate in a final annual review and summary at the retreat. Chelsea said the committee intends to return with a formal resolution in December after incorporating feedback.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in