Commissioners flag table header errors in building-width rules; recommend clarifying frontage terms
Planning commissioners found inconsistencies between 'building width' and 'frontage' headings in recodified tables and recommended updating table headers so measurements keep matching how the code has been applied in practice.
The full story
Commissioners identified a drafting inconsistency in the recodification packet where table headers referenced "building width" but the operative column and applicability related to frontage or facade widths. Staff said the new code had introduced a definition for "primary frontage line" and that tables should be updated to avoid confusion in measurement and application.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in